International
Browse Categories
|
A Short Guide to Writing about Film (Short Guides Series)BUY FROM AMAZON.COM
Price: $36.00
Usually ships in 24 hours RRP: Buy New: $36.00 You Save: $4.00 (10%) Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours EDITORIAL REVIEWDoubling an introduction to film study and a practical writing guide, this brief text introduces students to film terms and the major film theories, enabling them to write more critically. Examples from newer movies provide a fresh list of references for students introduced to film study and writing films. The author presents several approaches to film analysis and writing about film–auteurs, genres, ideology, kinds of formalism, and national cinemas, and introduces students to a range of film terms and film theories. Recent movies are used to fresh examples. Multiple approaches to writing about film as well as theories about film are given. Please enter here. PRODUCT DETAILSPublisher: LongmanPub. Date: 8th January 2006 Catalog: Book Media: Paperback Number Of Pages: 190 Ean: 9780321412287 Isbn: 0321412281 ABOUT THIS BOOKUSER REVIEWS
I received the book I had ordered in less than a week. It was in great condition. I was very pleased. It was an easy read and was very helpful to me for the film class I was taking on American Westerns, in which I had to write three research papers.
Timothy Corrigan, in the preface to "A Short Guide to Writing About Films, sixth edition," says, "Writing essays about films is, in short, one of the most sophisticated ways to respond to them." In this concise book, he lucidly explains how to write screen reports, movie reviews, as well as theoretical and critical essays on films. Here's a sample of his lucid writing. Defining terms often used in film study: mise-en-scene -- "the arrangement of the so-called theatrical elements before they are actually filmed; these include sets, lighting, costumes, and props"; shot/reverse shot -- "an editing pattern that cuts between individuals according to the logic of their conversation"; jump cut -- "a cut within the continuous action of a shot, creating a spatial or temporal jump or discontinuity within the action." Moreover, this updated edition explains the supplementary features often included in DVDs such as story boards, behind-the-scene documentaries, and interviews with the cast and crews. Even if you don't intend to write about films, reading this blessedly brief book will enhance your enjoyment of watching films. Five shining stars. -- C J Singh
One thing I can say is I enjoy a good film. O.K. if it moves I'll watch it. But until I read this book I really was just looking with out seeing. It is nice to have this guide confirm what one knows as common sense. Probably because the guide is designed to take you from ground zero to a level of appreciation and allow you to convey your opinion intelligently. If you have an earlier edition you will still get the essence of the book. Newer editions add different resources and research information. Some of the highlights are: * A shot-by shot analysis of a sequence from the film "Potemkin" * Suggestions on using the Internet * Sample student writing Some contents: Writing about the Movies Preparing to Watch and Preparing to Write Film Terms and Topics Six Approaches to writing about Film Style and Structure in Writing Researching the Movies Manuscript Form This guide is an eye opener.
I am currently a film major who is being forced to read this book. Let me say that so far I am only to chapter three and have suffered through every page of it. It is filled with basic, common sense, (i.e., the best way to write about film is to take notes during the screening. and if you can, it's good to see the movie more than once), which is explained in several pages. Give me a break. Not only does he present basic knowlnedge but he repeats himself in so many words. The truth is, the only way to successfully analize film is to develop an eye for symbolism. No book, I don't care who writes it, can teach you that. It is something that must be personally developed. Why someone would waste their time writing a book trying to teach people how to do that blows my mind. I give it one star, cause after all, everyone deserves a little comething for at least trying.
I'm writing to second mitry's opinion of the book and to add to mitry's comment about kenosha's complaint of textual errors. I have the second edition of the book, and Corrigan speaks of Captain Willard and refers to Marlowe as "the other Captain Willard" (p. 43). It's clear from the context that he is comparing the film character with Conrad's protagonist. I doubt Corrigan would have revised the 2nd edition text here to make an error in the 3rd edition. Don't get turned off by an erroneous review! SIMILAR ITEMS: |

Fast, Good, Easy, Helpful
TWO THUMBS DOWN