Search:
International
UK US
Browse Categories

Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking

BUY FROM AMAZON.COM
Price: $10.36

Usually ships in 24 hours

By: D.Q. Mcinerny
(26 customer reviews)
RRP: $12.95
Buy New: $10.36
You Save: $2.59 (20%)


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours

EDITORIAL REVIEW

Whether regarded as a science, an art, or a skill–and it can properly be regarded as all three–logic is the basis of our ability to think, analyze, argue, and communicate. Indeed, logic goes to the very core of what we mean by human intelligence. In this concise, crisply readable book, distinguished professor D. Q. McInerny offers an indispensable guide to using logic to advantage in everyday life. Written explicitly for the layperson, McInerny’s Being Logical promises to take its place beside Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style as a classic of lucid, invaluable advice.

As McInerny notes, logic is a deep, wide, and wonderfully varied field, with a bearing on every aspect of our intellectual life. A mastery of logic begins with an understanding of right reasoning–and encompasses a grasp of the close kinship between logical thought and logical expression, a knowledge of the basic terms of argument, and a familiarity with the pitfalls of illogical thinking. Accordingly, McInerny structures his book in a series of brief, penetrating chapters that build on one another to form a unified and coherent introduction to clear and effective reasoning.

At the heart of the book is a brilliant consideration of argument–how an argument is founded and elaborated, how it differs from other forms of intellectual discourse, and how it critically embodies the elements of logic. McInerny teases out the subtleties and complexities of premises and conclusions, differentiates statements of fact from statements of value, and discusses the principles and uses of every major type of argument, from the syllogistic to the conditional. In addition, he provides an incisive look at illogical thinking and explains how to recognize and avoid the most common errors of logic.

Elegant, pithy, and precise, Being Logical breaks logic down to its essentials through clear analysis, accessible examples, and focused insights. Whether you are a student or a teacher, a professional sharpening your career skills or an amateur devoted to the fine points of thought and expression, you are sure to find this brief guide to effecting reasoning both fascinating and illuminating.


From the Hardcover edition.

PRODUCT DETAILS

Publisher: Random House Trade Paperbacks
Pub. Date: 10th May 2005
Catalog: Book
Media: Paperback
Number Of Pages: 160
Ean: 9780812971156
Isbn: 0812971159

ABOUT THIS BOOK

USER REVIEWS

A decent, concise introduction
~ Written on Jun 7, 2008. out of users found this review helpful.

This is a decent refresher on formal (and not so formal) logic, for anyone who took a logic class so many years ago. Or for those who didn't, it's a good introduction. It's modeled more or less on Strunk and White, so it's concise (maybe a bit too much), and it's not very technical. It doesn't cover all the bases, e.g. there's nothing on truth trees, but it does a good job with the fundamentals, including the more common fallacies.

Someone (maybe this author) said something to the effect that logic is the most neglected subject in US schools today and the most in need of being returned to a central place in the curriculum. If that's not precisely true, it must be pretty close. Just look at what passes for political debate these days, and the fact that almost no one cares that candidates don't actually use premises, don't bother with valid arguments, don't make rational connections, and draw conclusions that can't possibly be supported. Sheesh .... Copies should be handed out with all birth certificates.

Good, But There are Better
~ Written on May 24, 2008. 1 out of 1 users found this review helpful.

Buy A Rulebook for Arguments by Anthony Weston instead of this book. Reasons are below.

Both Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking by D.Q. Mcinerny (this book), and A Rulebook for Arguments, by Anthony Weston site the same exact book as their inspiration. Both books are of similar structure, focused on the topic of logic. They both reference The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. (and E. B. White) as their source of inspiration.

As a result, both books attempt to be a short book, easy to read, with the goal of explaining the basic rules of logic to anyone. This book only meets two of the three goals. The other meets all three.

This book is short, and does review the basic rules of logic and critical thinking. However, while someone can breeze through A Rulebook for Arguments with almost no effort, this book (Being Logical) is a bit tough to read at times by comparison.

For example, there is a passage in Negative Statements section of the Language of Logic chapter where the author spends a paragraph or two concluding that it is always clearer to your audience to use the positive phrasing of a statement whenever possible. The very next paragraph begins with an unnecessary use of a negative statement (middle of page 54). Not only does it dawn on the reader that the author violated their own rule, but the book is full of language that is slightly more complex than it needs to be.

Some of the examples that use science can bother someone with a science background. The author occasionally trys to emphasize how concrete something can be by using a "hard science" as an example. When doing so it became even more mixed up. In one passage the author used molecules and elements as though they were interchangeable terms with identical meaning. If you don't know, maybe it doesn't bother you that molecules are composed of the elements, in a higher more ordered complex structure, and the terms don't have the same meaning. The point of logic trying to be made was still there, but it just got muddied a bit when you get bogged down in "huh? but..."

Very helpful.
~ Written on Apr 7, 2008. out of users found this review helpful.

I found this book to very helpful. I discuss logic with a close circle of friends now and my rhetoric as well as my thinking process has gotten a lot better. This book is very helpful from start to finish with intuitive examples and provides a solid foundation.

I do wish that there was a section in the back for further reading, but I found my way through regardless.

Highly recommended!

Not good at all
~ Written on Mar 22, 2008. 1 out of 7 users found this review helpful.

The book is too simple to the point that the author makes u feel like an idiot. Poor examples and wash down prose.

there are much better book in the topic than this

Good for a first logic reader
~ Written on Mar 10, 2008. out of users found this review helpful.

This book aims to be to logic, what "The Elements of Style" is to writing. Arranged in 5 parts ("Preparing the mind for logic", "basic principles of logic", "The argument", "sources of illogical thinking" and "principle forms of illogical thinking"), each part has short highly-readable sections. Perhaps in "Preparing the mind of logic" McInery is "preachy" such as "It is juvenile to use language simply to shock.", "not to pursue the truth, would be absurd, since it the only thing that gives meaning ...". We would be missing great poetry if everyone avoided "ambiguous language" or the "state of uncertainty concerning the truth".

Under "Basic principles", perhaps he avoids some of the harder problems of "primary cause" under the principle of sufficient reason. In "The Argument" he painlessly introduces deduction, syllogism, symbology and even Venn diagrams while avoiding cumbersome terminology. His discussion of "inductive" argument was somewhat weak and scattered, and he could have done with better exploration of "Causal connections" and probability. His emphasis on truth could have been improved with discussion of standards for evidence. Perhaps in the section on "sources of illogical thinking", he offers good advice, but a little simplistic, and contra to his advice on skepticism is Rene Descartes "Everything can be doubted". In this season of election debates the "principle forms of illogical thinking" is a concise introduction.

This is a well written book for introducing logic, but more experienced readers will want to move on to other works.

SIMILAR ITEMS: