View Single Post
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 26-Aug-2006, 22:32
MrPedantic MrPedantic is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: England
Posts: 2,098
Current Location: SE England
First Language: British English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 70 Times in 69 Posts
MrPedantic will become famous soon enough
Default Re: How would you define the future time?

Hello Shun

Quote:
It is a shame you gentlemen don't even know there are past repeated actions, present repeated actions, and future repeated actions. They entail different tenses.
Over the last couple of centuries, the progressive present tense has gradually replaced the simple present tense, in the expression of present actions.

Thus now we say "I'm going" where Shakespeare might have said "I go".

This means that the default meaning of the simple present tense is that of a repeated action, for most native speakers. If I say (for instance):

1. I go to Harrod's to buy my artichokes.

a native speaker does not interpret it as meaning "I am now going to Harrod's to buy artichokes". Rather, the sentence suggests "my custom is to go to Harrod's to buy artichokes".

Verbs such as "think", "expect", and "believe", on the other hand, have retained a stronger sense of "presentness", in the simple present tense. If you say:

2. I think you're right.

you mean "at this moment, it is my opinion that you are right".

It is of course possible to express a repeated action in the past or future, e.g.

3. I used to buy my artichokes at Harrod's.
4. I will be buying my artichokes at Harrod's.

But the simple present has a different function: if I say

5. I go to work by train.

it means I have habitually gone to work by train in the past, and I expect to go to work by train in future. (The one place you would not expect to say it is on the train, on the way to work.)

(I'm sorry if this doesn't answer your question; I may have misunderstood your earlier post.)

All the best,

MrP
Reply With Quote