View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2006, 13:11
riverkid riverkid is offline
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,922
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 437 Times in 404 Posts
riverkid is just really niceriverkid is just really niceriverkid is just really niceriverkid is just really niceriverkid is just really nice
Default Re: The meaning of "should"

Quote:
Originally Posted by nyugaton View Post
I do not seek your death, God knows; I should be sorry to see you suffer in the least."
What does this "should" mean?
I think it could hold both a deontic and epistemic meaning and in this case they are so similar.

should [deontic] = it's commonly accepted by good people that feeling this way is a good thing.

OR

should [epistemic] = it's highly probable/there's a strong likelihood that I would be sorry to see you suffer. I think this use of 'should' shows a weaker epistemic meaning than 'would'; would carries a 100% meaning but 'should is, in this case, a bit weaker.
Reply With Quote