Thread: Had better
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-Sep-2006, 15:45
riverkid riverkid is offline
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Had better

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ana Laura View Post
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any difference between these 2 sentences:
1)'You'd better not touch her again;otherwise I will kill you'.
2)'You'd better not touch her again or I will kill you'.
Could you give me an example with 'only if' and 'On condition that'?
Thanks.
IMHO, I think they make perfect sense, Ron. Paraphrased, they both mean,

"If you touch her again, I will kill you."

OR

"My strong [yet purposefully understated] advice is, don't touch her again. If you do, I'll kill you."

There is, to my mind, [and I could be missing something and if that's so, I'd like to have it pointed out to me], no other way that they can be glossed [interpreted/understood]].

For different collocations we use differing forms of negation.

'Only if you don't touch her again will you escape being killed'.

'On condition that you don't touch her again, then and only then, will you escape being killed.'
Reply With Quote