View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-Sep-2006, 13:20
riverkid riverkid is offline
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 474 Times in 437 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: The epistemic "would"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tdol View Post
Where would you rank 'may well win'?
Hi Tdol.

'may well' and 'might' well' both sit at the top of their respective ranges, so a 'might well' can be virtually identical to a tentative [intonationally] 'may. In other words, there is a blurring at the "break points".

The numbers that I've used only represent a rough idea of the placement of these modals. It's hard to pin down exact cut off points and in speech and especially in writiing these modals usually only show a range, not a specificity.

So too, 'very likely + verb' sits at the high range of the 'should/probably/likely' grouping.

Last edited by riverkid; 15-Sep-2006 at 13:47.
Reply With Quote