Quote:
Originally Posted by gorikaz  What's the difference between A and B below?
A) He said that he would call you back later.
B) He said that he will call you back later.
I followed the rule of the sequence of tenses in A) and changed "will" to the past tence "would." Is it acceptable and preferred in formal writing? Which is more acceptable in formal writing? |
First, there is no "rule" for the sequence of tenses/concord of tenses. It was another example of poor analysis of language. There are guidelines for backshifting that
can occur and often do occur in writing, especially newspapers and voice media.
As to the sentences, there is no difference in meaning, Gorikaz. This example sounds like it is an example of speech. All B) [using 'would'] is doing is telling the listener that the speaker is reporting the speech, not giving a direct quote.
The direct speech was probably something like this; "Tell him that I will call him back later."
ENLs have a choice of using a backshift, to 'would' or we can report with 'will' and often do when the report is still current and meaningful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad-ox hi, 
The B variant is wrong.
For the future in the past we use "would".
madox |
There's nothing wrong with B), Mad-ox. This isn't an example of the future in the past. The only part of,
"He said that he would call you back later",
that is past is 'said'. Both 'would' and 'will' point to something that is going to happen, ie. both are future referent.