View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2006, 08:59
BobK's Avatar
BobK BobK is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: England (South East)
Posts: 5,253
Current Location: England (South East)
First Language: English
Thanks: 52
Thanked 564 Times in 494 Posts
BobK is a name known to allBobK is a name known to allBobK is a name known to allBobK is a name known to allBobK is a name known to allBobK is a name known to all
Default Re: Plural of the word "status"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPedantic View Post
3. Stati is not the correct plural in Latin, but is quite common in English.
...

I feel a little sorry for #3. I wonder whether a convoluted case might be made for it: perhaps on the grounds that we are now so accustomed to -i as a plural for any remotely Latin-looking word that ends in -us, that it's almost a valid English plural in itself. (This would also let "octopi" off the hook.)
MrP
And I feel quite sorry about #3 As I've said elsewhere, people who go around sticking Latinate endings willy-nilly on any vaguely Latin-looking word are ignorami with hidden agendae; I just wish compulsory Latin was on more school syllabi. (But let's not get into that )

b
Reply With Quote