hi everybody there,
Bush refused to spell out how the United States
would retaliate. "They
'd be held to account," the president said in an ABC News interview.
In light of North Korea's Oct. 9 test detonation of a nuclear bomb, Bush warned that any transfer of nuclear material elsewhere in the world by the North
would be considered a grave threat to the security of the United States.
"If we get intelligence that they're about to transfer a nuclear weapon, we
would stop the transfer, and we
would deal with the ships that were taking the — or the airplane that was dealing with taking the material to somebody," the president said.
Asked how he
would retaliate, Bush
would not be specific, "You know, I'd just say it's a grave consequence."
"The leader of North Korea to understand that he
'll be held to account. Just like he's being held to account now for having run a test," Bush said.
Bush: U.S. will stop N. Korea nuke moves - Yahoo! News
my questions are:
1) What is the grammer for "the red woulds" here if there is any?
2) "They
'd be held to account," AND "he
'll be held to account."
do these two sentences have any grammatical diffrences
3) "held to account" what does this phrase mean?
i appreciate any ansewer.
thanks in advance.