Thread: Nouns
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 22-Nov-2006, 09:26
BobK's Avatar
BobK BobK is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: England (South East)
Posts: 5,669
Current Location: England (South East)
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 70
Thanked 804 Times in 707 Posts
BobK is a splendid one to beholdBobK is a splendid one to beholdBobK is a splendid one to beholdBobK is a splendid one to beholdBobK is a splendid one to beholdBobK is a splendid one to beholdBobK is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Nouns

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNewYork View Post
I agree with BobK, but "fox" is also a plural of "fox".
Is that so. I've heard the null plural when there is a pair (or 'brace') of something - 'a brace of pheasant', 'a pair of trout', (but not *'a pair of kipper' Why's that - perhaps because it's only one herring). And of course, there's the 'indiscriminate' plural, when they don't care how many they get: 'they're going to hunt fox'/ 'they're going to shoot deer'. But 'A family of foxes live in our garden'.

I hadn't realized how complicated plurals can get - especially in the field of animals.

b
Reply With Quote