View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 20-Dec-2006, 22:04
MikeNewYork's Avatar
MikeNewYork MikeNewYork is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: USA
Posts: 6,094
Current Location: New York
First Language: American English
Member Type: Academic
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
MikeNewYork is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Deficiencies in the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobK View Post
No, I honestly didn't mean you AV. It's just that when I was a student I had more time for academic arguments (I even read Aspects... - that's how conscientious I was )

b
I think Chomsky was very clever. I'm not so sure that his theories were clever, but he cleverly proposed things that can't really be disproven. Of course, they can't be proved either. One of his initial premises (one which I've never accepted) is that brain of children is not developed enough to produce unique language. First of all, I think that we know so little about how the brain works, that this premise is absurd on its face. There seem to be some cracks developing in some of Chomsky's foundation premises. Some say they are for the "birds".

ScienceDaily: The Birds And The B's: Challenging Chomsky, Starlings Learn 'Human-only' Syntax Patterns
Reply With Quote