View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-Feb-2007, 18:09
BobK's Avatar
BobK BobK is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: England (South East)
Posts: 6,046
Current Location: England (South East)
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 91
Thanked 1,031 Times in 911 Posts
BobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud ofBobK has much to be proud of
Default Re: "resources" or "stocks"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dextrous View Post
As a native English speaker, I would go with provisions if I had to choose from that list.

But out of B and C, I agree with you that C sounds better.
As another native speaker, I disagree on both counts . Out of those options, I would choose B. I feel that 'stocks' should refer to concrete consumables - baked beans, soup, toothpaste...: We don't have that brand, but we are expecting further stocks this week. In the singular, the notion of consumables is not there; it could refer to clothing: We don't have that size, but we are expecting new stock this week.

But I would prefer 'reserves' to 'resources', and that's not an option.

b
Reply With Quote