View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-Mar-2007, 13:43
Andrew Whitehead Andrew Whitehead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: Yorkshire
Posts: 260
Current Location: Singapore
First Language: English
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Andrew Whitehead is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The book reads well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea
Very nice explanation. However, that is exactly how mediopassive verbs (not middle verbs) are described.
Oh...thank you... Is 'that' referring to 'with syntactical link' or to 'without syntactical link'?

I think you are missing my point a little, as my issue is with the verb 'reads' specifically.

As far as I am aware, a middle verb describes a quality of the preceding noun, and a mediopassive has a stative(or stative like) verb and an unexpressed actor.

Transwicki:'a grammatical voice in which the actor of a stative verb is not expressed'

Reads is a dynamic verb. It fails the Dowty tests, and since it describes a mental action I can't sensibly see even a 'stative-like' quality - in short, it is a purely dynamic verb.

This appears important to me. If we are referencing a stative verb, or even a stative-like quality in a nominally dynamic verb, because we are talking about a state there is no need to mention an actor. This makes sense.

On the other hand, if there is no stative-like reference, then we are definitely talking about an act and we must have a stated (or at least implied) actor, which excludes it from being used in a mediopassive.

I believe this to be the situation with 'reads'.

Last edited by Andrew Whitehead; 12-Mar-2007 at 13:50.
Reply With Quote