View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 16-Jun-2007, 02:01
fiona bramble fiona bramble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 342
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
fiona bramble is on a distinguished road
Default Re: relative clauses (that vs. who)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea View Post
Good question. Take another look at this structure, Jane's the best tennis player. It's copular ('s = is). The subject complement here, a title, the best tennis palyer, refers to a person, Jane. So, the best pronoun for that referential pair would be that, not which, because that can refer to people and things, whereas which cannot.

Does that help?
Hi C,
Yes, you are absolutely right about the superlative + that combo. I just have a quick question. I recently replied to a thread saying that "which" could not be used as a relative pronoun referring to people (in this case it was "family"). Anglika & engee30 both though "which" was fine. I suggested perhaps if the family was considered a unit (thing-like!) then maybe it was possible but it didn't sit well with me. What do you think?
F
Reply With Quote