View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 16-Jun-2007, 04:13
Casiopea's Avatar
Casiopea Casiopea is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
Casiopea is on a distinguished road
Default Re: relative clauses (that vs. who)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fiona bramble View Post
Hi C,
I recently replied to a thread saying that "which" could not be used as a relative pronoun referring to people (in this case it was "family"). Anglika & engee30 both though "which" was fine. I suggested perhaps if the family was considered a unit (thing-like!) then maybe it was possible but it didn't sit well with me. What do you think?
F
fiona, I agree with you, Anglika, and engee30, and, not to forget, Delmobile.

The noun family has more than one referent. It refers to the unit itself, the group (a thing) as well as to the people in that group.

People: I'm talking about the family who ...
Unit: I'm talking about the family that / which ...



Lenka, the phrase the best person houses the noun person, yes, but that noun is also modified by an adjective, one that turns the noun phrase into name for a person. Names are not people, which is why that, not who works best with your example sentence.

Does that help?

Last edited by Casiopea; 16-Jun-2007 at 07:45.
Reply With Quote