View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 21-Jul-2007, 04:36
Casiopea's Avatar
Casiopea Casiopea is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 54 Times in 53 Posts
Casiopea will become famous soon enough
Default Re: burn down vs. be burnt down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Englishlanguage View Post
Can't a verb be ... ergative and ... middle voice?
Yes!, and that's an excellent observation. Tense, as I had originially stated, has nothing to do with the difference between these two examples:

Ergative (past tense): The house burnt down.
Middle (present tense): The house burns down.

They are examples of an ergative verb in middle voice.



There are only three voices in English: active, passive, and middle or mediopassive.
... the intransitive construction of an ergative verb is often said to be in a middle voice, between active and passive, or in a mediopassive voice, between active and passive but closer to passive.
Source
!Correction!
Middle (or mediopassive) voice
Present tense: The house burns down as the crowd looks on. <ergative>
Past tense: The house burnt down yesterday. <ergative>
An ergative verb is a verb that may be either transitive or intransitive, and whose subject when it is intransitive plays the same semantic role as its direct object when it is transitive. For example, [burn down] is an ergative verb, such that the following sentences are roughly synonymous:
  • The house burnt down.
  • The house was burnt down.
  • Someone burnt down the house.
... the intransitive construction does not permit an agent to be mentioned, and indeed can imply that no agent is present, ...
Source: ibid

Last edited by Casiopea; 21-Jul-2007 at 04:44.
Reply With Quote