Thread: Conditionals
View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 22-Jul-2007, 13:18
Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Country: Bremen - Germany
Location: Germany
First Language: English
Posts: 1,084
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Conditionals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tdol View Post
Yes, you can. This is the form where 'if' can be replaced with 'should', which is the topic of the thread.
1. So Tdol to put them on a scale of possibility and probability:
- Should replaced with if (zero to first conditional: increases possibility)
Should takes it into the first conditional. It's called the zero conditional as they express certainty not probability.
- If replaced with should (decreases probability: first to second conditional)
In BE, we do replace 'if' with 'should' in the first conditional and it seems to reduce the probability of the condition being met, like a halfway house to the second conditional.

2. So In all cases should functions as a border crossing from zero conditional to first conditional and then again from first conditional to second conditional.

3. BTW when is not conditional at all because it doesn’t set a condition. It refers to time: “When he comes” means I know he comes but I don’t know the time whereas “if he comes” means I don’t know.

4.What about provided that and given..

Last edited by Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim : 22-Jul-2007 at 13:40.
Reply With Quote