View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-Aug-2007, 11:31
bianca's Avatar
bianca bianca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: sweden
Posts: 1,029
Current Location: stockholm
First Language: swedish
Member Type: Academic
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
bianca is on a distinguished road
Default Re: linguistic theories (grammar, language)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea View Post
They're certainly not going to assume that when you said theory you meant hypothesis. Sure, there is a difference between the two words, but not when it comes to a specific linguistic concept.

I have yet to see your evidence.

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

In his book The Act of Writing (see link above), Daniel Chandler writes the headline "hypothesis", but in the text he refers to it as the Sapir-Whorf theory. Hypothesis and theory in this particular case are used interchangeably. I agree that some "theories" are only known as theories, like Darwin's and Einstein's theories (I've never heard of them as hypotheses), but others (like this one) are referred to as both t and h. Maybe it is due to disagreements among linguists. If it had only been a hypothesis as distinguished from theory, under no circumstances would it have been called a theory, especially not by linguists.

Last edited by bianca; 08-Aug-2007 at 12:13.
Reply With Quote