Thread: next, after
View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 16-Sep-2007, 20:32
justinwschang justinwschang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: singapore
Posts: 118
Current Location: beijing
First Language: english
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
justinwschang is on a distinguished road
Default Re: next, after

Quote:
Originally Posted by engee30 View Post
The other way round, I would say.

We got back home at midnight. It (the time) was late. (adverb)
We got back home by bus. It (the bus) was late. (adjective)
"Late" can modify time (so adjective) but "late" cannot modify a person (so adverb) unless it means he's dead (the late Darth Vader).

Semantically (meaning-wise), what's the difference between:
He was late, versus
The leaves are everywhere
Going by your view, "everywhere" modifies "leaves", in exactly the same way as "late" modifies "he", so both are adjectives (which "everywhere" definitely is not). If you say "everwhere" doesn't modify "leaves" but "late" modifies "he", what's the reason or the difference? Is there a difference in semantics? No.
We cannot explain away the non-existence of any difference in meaning between the two by simply calling "everywhere" an adverbial and treating "are" as so-called non-linking.
Reply With Quote