View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 17-Dec-2007, 18:57
riverkid riverkid is offline
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 4
Thanked 481 Times in 442 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Finished adverbs with the present perfect

Quote:
Originally Posted by rewboss View Post
That's a straw man: I'm not taking a prescriptivist stance.
I think that you're being overly sensitive, Rewboss. I never said that you were taking a prescriptivist stance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rewboss View Post
Yes there are. And there's precious little difference between an "override" and an "exception", in that both are deviations from a rule. The main difference is that "override" just sounds more like a rule; but if you think about it, an exception is in itself a type of rule.
The problem was that prescriptivists never took the time to figure these things out. They just fell back, still do just fall back on a catch all exceptions clause. Were this not the case, then proof would be forthcoming to support prescriptive positions. It never is because there's nothing there to provide the support


Quote:
Originally Posted by rewboss View Post
Whether you prefer to construct a new grammar rule along the lines of, "A past time adjunct with the present perfect is permissible when the sentence exceeds a certain length," or take the true descriptivist approach and say that in natural speech, speakers will frequently add a past time adjunct to a present perfect without bothering to go back and correct the verb phrase, is unimportant: both positions describe what is happening here, but one is expressed as a rule and the other is expressed as an observation.
I never made the assumption that "speakers will frequently add a past time adjunct to a present perfect without bothering to go back and correct the verb phrase". I believe that was your submission.

I did not suggest that it was a frequent occurrence. Let me go back and check. Right, I'm back. I said;

"It's often said that we don't use the present perfect with past time adverbial adjuncts. That is overwhelmingly the case BUT there are certain instances where this is overridden."

All I did was note that these overrides do occur, and I offered a potential reason for the same. I don't know for sure that it's right, but I do know that these overrides occur.


Last edited by riverkid; 17-Dec-2007 at 19:04.
Reply With Quote