View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24-Dec-2007, 10:24
Anglika Anglika is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: UK
Posts: 14,989
Current Location: UK
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,974 Times in 2,801 Posts
Anglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond reputeAnglika has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: including cricket words

Quote:
Originally Posted by lalda222 View Post
Dear sir, please explain

1. Kumble earned 4 wickets for 56 runs but he alone could not paper over the cracks of another pitiful batting display.
I
t was the scalp that the tourist[ s. africa] craved and effectively scuppered their hopes of a challenging total.
He struck a clutch of lusty blows to frustrate South Africa's rampant attack and embellish the tourists' victory target with 20 potentially priceless runs.
He clubbed 7 sixes in a blistering display of clean hitting.
He spooned back a chance to bowler Haris.
He slammed five sixes in his pugnacious knock of 56 runs.


lalda
1 Kumble took 4 wickets against the opponents' 56 runs, but even this is not good enough to hide the poor quality batting.
2 It was what the South African team wanted and prevented [India] from achieving their goal of high level of runs.
3 He managed to get 20 runs that contributed to the Indian team's goal of a high level of runs that they needed to win.
4 He got seven six-run hits in a vigorous display.
5 He managed to get a chance to [?] bowl Harris
6 He hit five six-run ball in his aggressive series of 56 runs.
Reply With Quote