View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2004, 04:33
Taka Taka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default Re: Against dictionary?

Sorry, Mike. Let me ask one more thing to make things clear.

I have a question on this part.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNewYork
Yes, in my opinion, "matter" is an intransitive verb. There is no transfer of action from the subject to an object with "matter". It is a state of being.
Is this always true? I mean, if a verb is about a state of being, is it true that it never has a noun to be followed as an object? Take "mean", for example. In my opinion, the verb "mean" indicates a state of being; "That means X" is semantically equivalent to "That is X". However, grammatically "mean" is a transitive verb and, say, in "That means nothing", "nothing" is an object, not an adverb.
Reply With Quote