Thread: auxiliary
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-Mar-2008, 06:49
Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Country: Bremen - Germany
Location: Germany
First Language: English
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim is on a distinguished road
Default Re: auxiliary

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirimaru View Post
I'm using a text book named A University Grammar of English ,an interesting but difficult one .In the chapter about verbs & the verb phrase ,I find the classification of verbs :
verbs consist of two kinds,lexical verbs & auxiliary .Modal auxiliaries include can ,may shall ,will ,could ,might ,should,would,must,ought to,used to ,need,dare

what's about have to ? Is have to a modal verb?
If it is a modal verb ,why isn't it mentioned in this part?
Please help me with this .
Modal verbs like: can, will, must are also called defective verbs because they don't have a past participle like will, can or even a past tense like must. Hence they cannot be used in perfect or future tenses. You need substitutes which make up for this deficiency like: have to and be able to.

Last edited by Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim : 27-Mar-2008 at 06:54.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim For This Useful Post:
kirimaru (12-Apr-2008)