View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-Jun-2004, 18:24
RonBee's Avatar
RonBee RonBee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,371
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Thanks: 73
Thanked 848 Times in 759 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blacknomi
I agree with you to make homonym as the main category. This is how I teach myself. But I'm not sure if I get the idea of "homomorph", that is, homomorphs may pronounce the same but function differently.


boxes ==> plural suffix
catches ==> verb suffix to indicate third-person-singular

Is that right?
No, I think those classifications would apply only to entire words, not suffixes. Here is Mike's definition of homomorph:
  • 3) homomorph: words that are spelled the same and pronounced the same, but which have different meanings (and possibly different etymologies)
I think one example might be fine. As an adjective it means apt or appropriate. Or it is a word that expresses agreement or approval. Example: "That is fine with me." As a noun, it is a penalty. Example: "The man had to pay a fine."

Mike, what do you think?

:)
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote