View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 16:39
naomimalan naomimalan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: England
Posts: 224
Current Location: France
First Language: English
Thanks: 35
Thanked 96 Times in 73 Posts
naomimalan will become famous soon enoughnaomimalan will become famous soon enough
Default Re: the negative pattern of 'used to'

Quote:
Originally Posted by banderas View Post
If you would like to sound old-fashioned or very formal, feel free to to say "usedn't". I personally see it as a mistake and suggest that you use the usual way of making used to negative with didn't. I believe most people do so.
I agree Banderas, though I mightn't go so far as to call 'usedn't to' (or 'used not to' for that matter)a mistake yet. In a few decades' time it may be considered a mistake but so far I'd say it's still acceptable even though, as you say, it sounds old-fashioned or (for 'used not to' in any case)very formal.

I think in formal written English "used not to" (not 'usedn't to') still prevails.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to naomimalan For This Useful Post:
enydia (08-May-2008)