View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 21:15
David L. David L. is offline
Key Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: UK
Posts: 2,683
Current Location: UK
First Language: English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 879 Times in 793 Posts
David L. is a splendid one to beholdDavid L. is a splendid one to beholdDavid L. is a splendid one to beholdDavid L. is a splendid one to beholdDavid L. is a splendid one to beholdDavid L. is a splendid one to beholdDavid L. is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: anachronistic fallacy

It sounds really good - but unfortunately, not appropriate. In fact, I cannot get my head around an example of what constitutes something that is.
an 'anachronism' is a thing belonging or appropriate to a period in time other than that in which it exists, esp. a thing that is conspicuously old-fashioned : "Everything was as it would have appeared in centuries past apart from one anachronism, a bright yellow construction crane."
It's attributing a custom, event, or object to a period to which it does not belong.

...and it's not post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
Reply With Quote