View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-Jun-2008, 13:37
Soup's Avatar
Soup Soup is offline
Key Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,663
Current Location: Shanghai, China
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 28
Thanked 1,320 Times in 1,205 Posts
Soup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud of
Default Re: recent vs. contemporary

Quote:
Originally Posted by palinkasocsi View Post
I am actually interested in the scope of contemporariness and recentness: Can a theory of the 1980s be regarded as contemporary or recent? Perhaps both?

Best
Remoteness of time can be tricky, as you know and, in your case, depends on the theory. If, say, a theory from the 1980s is still in use today; i.e., Chomsky's 1957 theory in Syntactic Structures was still considered contemporary in the 1980s. In short, you need to know your audience and what they think. My advice is to avoid the problem by finding a better word.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Soup For This Useful Post:
palinkasocsi (14-Jun-2008)