Thread: gerunds
View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 15-Dec-2004, 10:08
Casiopea's Avatar
Casiopea Casiopea is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 54 Times in 53 Posts
Casiopea will become famous soon enough
Default Re: gerunds

Quote:
Originally Posted by notmyname216
Ok, using what I have learned so far on the sentence below:

She has a note demanding money.

"Demanding" is not a adverb, can not move "demanding" for it to sound correct.
"she"=object "has"=verb, "note"=object, who="she", what="money"
"Demanding" is not a gerund.
"has" is not a "be" form of verb so "demanding" not a verb

"demanding" must be a adjective.

Is this correct?
If not, why not.
She (subject) has (verb) a note demanding money (object).

Excellent analysis! You've covered adverbs, gerunds, and verbs, but you left out adjectives.

When we add in a form of BE (is, am, was, were, etc.) between the object 'a note' and 'demanding money, this is what happens:

. . .a note is demanding money.

The noun phrase 'a note' is the actor, or thing that's doing the 'demanding', so 'demanding' is part of a verb, which takes the word 'money' as its object, like this,

A note (subject) is demanding (verb) money (object).
=> A note is asking for money.

But 'is' is not in our original sentence, so we can't say that 'demanding' is a verb. But by adding 'is' we've shown that we're dealing with an adjective, or a phrase that describes the noun 'a note':

Q: What kind of a note?
A: A note demanding money. (Adjective, Participial phrase)

Words that modify nouns are known as adjectives. So 'demanding money' functions as an adjectival phrase, specifically, a participial phrase because the phrase has an ING word.

Hope that helps out.
Reply With Quote