Thread: ought to
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-Feb-2005, 11:32
maeve o'cuinn's Avatar
maeve o'cuinn maeve o'cuinn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Buenos Aires - ARGENTINA
Posts: 53
Current Location: Buenos Aires
First Language: Spanish
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
maeve o'cuinn is on a distinguished road
Default Re: ought to

Quote:
Originally Posted by irajzowghi
what's the past tense of ought to in indirect speech?

You ought to work harder John, the teacher said.
The teacher said that John ought to have worked harder.
>>>> However, if you wrote this you would be conveying the idea that John hasn't worked harder. So to give the same idea you just leave the reported speech in present tense.>>> "The teacher said that John ought to work harder"


Here, there is an explanation I've found in my Grammar book:

"Ought" has no past form, but we can use "ought to have + past participle" to express certain ideas about the past. This structure can be used to talk about things which were supposed to happen but did not, or to make guesses or draw conclusions about things which are not certain to have happened.

I ought to have phoned Ed this morning, but I forgot.

The Parkers ought to have got back from holiday yesterday. Has anybody seen them?



Hope this helps! Maeve

Last edited by maeve o'cuinn; 15-Feb-2005 at 11:56.
Reply With Quote