View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-Mar-2005, 10:11
Casiopea's Avatar
Casiopea Casiopea is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 39 Times in 39 Posts
Casiopea is on a distinguished road
Default Re: only men could act /play

Quote:
Originally Posted by ripley
Hi,
I would say 1) Only men could act, not 2) Only men could play. But is number 2) OK? I would choose 1) because there is no object. What would a native speaker do? and Why?
Both 1) and 2) lacks a direct object, Ripley. "play" functions as a base verb, a non-finite verb. It's an infinitive, like 'to play'. With modals, like "can", the second verb doesn't carry tense.

What about?

Only men performed on stage.

"could act" is ambiguous. It also means, had the ability, or woman also performed roles, but they couldn't act (i.e., they were bad actors). I think the meaning you're after is permission: only men were permitted on stage.
Reply With Quote