View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-Apr-2005, 10:47
Tdol Tdol is offline
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: UK
Posts: 25,275
Current Location: Phnom Penh
First Language: English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 338 Times in 308 Posts
Tdol has disabled reputation
Default Re: 100 million word British National Corpus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jing-Jo
Interesting thoughts...keep it going...TDOL, when you say you get your students to do (?) concordance checks on Google, how is it done? I am very new to this whole concordance data business but I like what I see...very interesting...

Cheers
Firstly, it's amazing how many people don't know how to use the " " in a search for a complete phrase. Armed with this, a student can do a simple comparison. Let's say we want to compare complete and utter with the word disgrace:

We do a search for "complete disgrace", using the inverted commas: 7,220, then we do "utter disgrace": 13,400. It is clear that both are correct, but 'utter' is more common. Now, let's try it with something else:

"complete change" 237,000
"utter change"
992
Here, the figures clearly show that 'complete'is the natural collocation.

British vs American usage

Compare http://www.google.com and http://www.google.co.uk, you can add Australian, http://www.google.com.au, etc. However, the .com doesn't only mean the USA- we're classified as US because we use a .com address, but it can give help.

Prepositional usage:

"Depend on"
18,200,000
"Depend of" (European student favourite mistake)
76,300
Google can help you with this.

This kind of use of Google as a language tool is easy and useful, but it has limitations. I think it's a good start.



Last edited by Tdol; 01-Apr-2005 at 10:48. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote