View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-Jun-2005, 10:27
Jens Jens is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7
First Language: German
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jens is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Simple past without defined time reference in AE

Another example:

A tries to speaks with B on the phone who isn't around and leaves a message and asks B to call back.
A tells C that he's waiting for B to call back.
Later on C wants an update on this:
1. C: Did B call you back?
2. C: Has B called you back?
3. C: Did B call you back yet?
4. C: Has B called you back yet?
I guess the implied time reference in all these sentences is "at any time up to now",
which "normally" (right, what is normal) calls for present perfect.
But what about the simple past sentences?
Would they be prefered in AE?
Where is the difference in AE?
Does any of these sentences sound unnatural?
Specifically:
Does 2. express more importance than 1.? Is 1. a more neutral way of asking?
What does 3. add to the meaning of 1.?
What does 4. add to the meaning of 2.?
Reply With Quote