|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Is this correct but awkward expression? How do you improve it? Can we use "a that caluse" as an object of a verb? The decision resulted in that the nations trade freely each other. Thanks a lot. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "That the town was doomed" is a good English clause [sentence]. It cannot occur alone, because the conjunction "that" marks it as part of a clause that has higher syntactic status. It would probably occur as a sentence subject, as in "That the town was doomed was a regrettable reality," or as a direct object, as in "We saw that the town was doomed." When a clause like this is a direct object, that object is almost always the object of a verb of cognition or communication: <We know that you did it.> <She said that you did it.> Your last sentence, "The decision resulted in that....," is not acceptable English: An English preposition, like your "in," cannot have a THAT clause as its object. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| So in the above case how can we write when I want to keep the clause because often changing a clause into a gerund form is improper and a clause form is necessary: 1. The words written on the wall can be understood as that the town was doomed. 2. The decision resulted in that the nations trade freely each other. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| grammar, sentence |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Grammar] The use of Understood in the present | Unregistered | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 29-May-2009 22:43 |
| understood | XINLAI-UE | Ask a Teacher | 3 | 29-Jul-2008 08:14 |
| Understood You | lisa*** | Ask a Teacher | 6 | 16-Mar-2008 06:57 |
| love or loves? | Relaxor | Ask a Teacher | 3 | 22-Aug-2007 20:51 |