No, it's not. We typically do not use "sound" as a progressive verb when "sound" is a linking verb.
They're sounding the alarm. - okay
He's sounding tired. - not okay
That band is sounding pretty good. Let me tell you. - Here, one could use sound to intensify the action, which would emphasize the idea that the band sounds good. However, typically "sound" is not progressive as a linking verb.
You're being tired. - Would you say this? I wouldn't. So why would I say "you're sounding tired"? I wouldn't say "you're sounding tired".
Last edited by PROESL; 04-Sep-2009 at 17:34.
It's possible that a native speaker could say this, but not as a normal and usual expression.
Just as "I'm liking it" is possible among native speakers even though "like" is a stative verb, "sounding tired" is possible even though "sound" is not typically used as a progressive verb.
Anything's possible - sometimes.
The boundary that separates "correct" from "incorrect" in English is, incertain cases
, not 100% clear.
My advice to a student is this: don't use "sound" as a progressive verb, though you could hear it used that way when a speaker wants to intensify a state or a condition.
You sound bad. You'd better get some rest.
Man! You're sounding really bad. You just better stay in today and get some rest.
I've never defended American dialect ever that is ungrammatical in British English. I've made note of disputed usage and language items marked as informal. As well, I've given my opinion of such language items.
Please, produce an example of such a time when I've "defended American dialect". You are using the phrase "defended American dialect", while "commented on informal usage" is more appropriate.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Last edited by PROESL; 04-Sep-2009 at 20:45.