Question of logic
I was just wondering something, if you have none of something then is the first one the "next" one.
For example if you have no children is the first one classed as the "next" one, I saw this particular phrase on a facebook profile and it didn't seem wholly adequate to me.
The exact phrase was "If you have none, the first one is the next one" surely next implies something real that preceded it?
Re: Question of logic
You're right. "Next" is generally not used in this way.
Originally Posted by HannibalBarca
For another example, doctors don't turn up for work in the morning and say "Next" to call in their first patient.
(In fact, doctors generally don't do this at all, but that's a different issue).
By riceball72 in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 03-Jun-2008, 01:58
By NLT in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 04-Nov-2006, 23:38
By JJD in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 25-Aug-2006, 03:24
By Jupiter in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 15-Jul-2006, 11:33
By j4mes_bond25 in forum General Language Discussions
Last Post: 14-Jul-2006, 08:33
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO