Woulkd it be possible in a statement not a question?
Good point.Originally Posted by tdol
It brings to mind . . ., well, another "rare" usage. Consider this,
Here's a riddle. I have two coins in my pocket. One is not a nickle (= 5 pennies) and one is not a quarter (= 25 pennies). Both are not nickles, and both are not quarters.
Answer: One is a nickle and one is a quarter.![]()
Other than riddles?????![]()
I believe context is the determinant.Originally Posted by tdol
[1] Both are not secretaries.
=> Of the two one is (not) a secretary
It's not the default reading, agreed, but it's possible, at least in my dialect. "Both" refers to a set, and that set is made up of two individual items. Negate the set and we get reading [a]; negate the individual items within that set and we get reading [b].
[a] neither is a secretary
[b] one is (not) a secretary
Interesting- there's no way I'd get the 'one is not' meaning from that.![]()