#1  
Old 25-Apr-2005, 14:25
aionides
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Who versus whom - when not so obvious

Hi there:

For the most part I am very clear on the use of who and whom. But I am stumped on what to do when it is not so clear as to whether it should be the subjective or the objective case.

Example:

The committee was trying to reach Americans, most of whom/who saw little hope in the process.

I am not clear. Should it be 'whom?' After all, 'whom' refers to the word Americans in the preceding clause and so is objective. But then again, who refers to those "who saw little hope," and so is subjective.

Totally stumped.

Kind regards,
Alex
  #2  
Old 26-Apr-2005, 04:00
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,376
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Who versus whom - when not so obvious

This is a tricky one, but for me the occurrence after the preposition 'of' would be the dictating factor and I would head for 'whom'.
  #3  
Old 26-Apr-2005, 04:51
Steven D's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 834
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Who versus whom - when not so obvious

Quote:
Originally Posted by aionides
Hi there:

For the most part I am very clear on the use of who and whom. But I am stumped on what to do when it is not so clear as to whether it should be the subjective or the objective case.

Example:

The committee was trying to reach Americans, most of whom/who saw little hope in the process.

I am not clear. Should it be 'whom?' After all, 'whom' refers to the word Americans in the preceding clause and so is objective. But then again, who refers to those "who saw little hope," and so is subjective.

Totally stumped.

Kind regards,
Alex

I would look at it this way:

1. We can say this started out as 2 sentences.

The committee was trying to reach Americans. Most of them saw little hope in the process.

most of them - refers to "Americans of course"


2. In order to make this one sentence, "whom" is used in place of "them". "Them" is an object. It's "most" who saw little hope - "most of them".


The committee was trying to reach Americans, most of whom saw little hope in the process.

Most saw little hope in the process. Most of the Americans saw little hope in the process. Most of them saw little hope in the process.

most of the Americans = most of them = most of whom

It is the majority, or most, that is the subject, not the Americans per se. It's "most of them". Most saw little hope in the process.

Last edited by Steven D; 26-Apr-2005 at 04:55.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
versus, whom, obvious


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"have dove" versus "have dived"/"dived" Unregistered Ask a Teacher 4 24-Mar-2010 01:51
"Me" Versus "I" hopechest General Language Discussions 16 24-Feb-2009 21:12
Was versus were argrammar Ask a Teacher 1 19-Apr-2005 04:37
nominative versus objective prounouns Anonymous Ask a Teacher 2 10-Jul-2004 19:42
conservatory versus veranda(h) valtango Ask a Teacher 5 26-Feb-2003 17:10


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.