|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| 2) The rules provided here are found in traditional handbooks What affect a writer's choice in deciding which to use? Thanks! |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
2. You can find them in traditional handbooks as well. That's the effect. What a coincidence! http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...l+handbooks%22 |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
The rules that are provided are the rules that are found in traditional handbooks. [1] 'that are' is omitted on both sides of the equation (remember that 'are' is a linking verb: The rules that are provided = the rules that are found in traditional handbooks. => The rules provided = the rules found in traditional handbooks. [2] 'the rules' is redundant, so the second one is replaced by a nominal demonstrative, referring back to the first 'the rules: The rules provided = the rules found in traditional handbooks. => The rules provided = those found in traditional handbooks. [3] Both 'the rules' and 'those' function as subjects, and since they are co-related, one of the two is omitted. The second one is omitted: The rules provided = found in traditional handbooks. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| A million thanks X-Mode. That is just where I found this quote. Are you one of its authors? |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| I'm extremly thankful, Casiopea. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| You're most welcome, Peter. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
No, I just thought maybe it would out there somewhere. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Could you give us your opinion, please? Do you think the writer purposely left in "those" for some reason when he/she could have left it out? The second subject could've been omitted, but it wasn't. Do you think the writer was aware of what he/she was doing when he/she wrote the sentence? Maybe it was something to do with the form of expression? Or is this really just of no matter, and the writer probably wasn't aware? I, somehow, feel that leaving in "those" sounds like a stronger statement. It might almost be like saying "They really are the ones found in traditional handbooks." |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| [QUOTE=Casiopea]Symmetry and redundancy: The rules that are provided are the rules that are found in traditional handbooks. [1] 'that are' is omitted on both sides of the equation (remember that 'are' is a linking verb: QUOTE] Hi Casio, I really like how you explained this. Can you answer a related question about a grammar rule, please? By leaving out "that are" are we reducing an adjective clause to a noun phrase? I know this can often be done with a form of the verb "be" in adjective clauses. Is that something else that's going on here as far as the grammar goes? The rules that are provided - clause The rules provided - phrase example: We have to talk to the guy who is sitting at that desk. We have to talk to the guy sitting at that desk. "the guy who is sitting at that desk" - clause "the guy sitting at that desk" - Leave out "who is" and it becomes a phrase. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| slight, difference, meaing |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there any difference? | james_chew_84 | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 14-Jan-2005 10:08 |
| making the difference | Anonymous | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 13-Oct-2004 16:47 |
| time difference | whl626 | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 14-Jan-2004 10:20 |
| the difference between Past & P.P. in the meaning | Anonymous | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 03-Feb-2003 16:06 |