Please correct where you need correction.
Sarooj also got $ 1,000 from us on 3rd February 2010 for her niece’s marriage. Sarooj needs financial help for his uncle's operation and he approched two trust to get monetory help. I dont know why he should aprroch and has not get any help one of them.
I am confused. I assume Sarooj is female, as you said "her niece's marriage". However, you then said "for his uncle's operation". I assumed that you were correct the first time and changed "his" to "her".
However, it then became very confusing. You said "...he approached two trusts..." Did her uncle approach two trusts? Also, the last sentence is very confusing. Do you not understand why he approached them? Or do you not understand why he has not received help from either of them?
I would guess that it is the latter, though from the outside it may appear illogical.
Sarooj is male.
He got some financial assistance for his niece's marriage. Now his approching us to get some help for operation of his uncle. At the same time for same purpose he approched an other trust. I am reporting to my boss about his dual standard. So I wrote in my previous note that I dont understand why he approch an other trust to get same amount. He failed to get any amount out of them.
I hope you understand what I am trying to write.
previously received = sounds more formal
no space between $ and number
his = gender agrees with Sarooj, not the niece
has approached = better choice of tense
trusts = correct plural form
monetary = correct spelling
don't = requires an apostrophe as it is a contraction of "do not"
I've basically rewritten the final line for you. I've split it into two sentences and tried to make it a bit clearer. I hope it's useful for you.