Thank you.

[panicmonger]

Even a low sound could catch my attention and make my hair rise.
Do I still have to use the past form of 'make' above?

Thank you so much.

[panicmonger]

Even a low sound could catch my attention and make my hair rise.
Do I still have to use the past form of 'make' above?

Thank you so much.

Sorry, maybe my question is not clear enough.
I hope this will help.

Supposedly, I should use 'made' in this sentence because it is in the past tense, but since the word is after 'could' and they are joined by using 'and', so do I still have to use the past form of 'make'?

Thank you.

[e2e4]

/A learner/

Since telling my own opinion is a motivation for learning from this site..

Even a low sound could catch my attention and make my hair rise.
Do I still have to use the past form of 'make' above?
I'd say,'Should I have used the past form of "make" in the sentence above?'
Thank you so much.

I think that "make" is OK here.
Let us both wait for a teacher answer.

[birdeen's call]

Supposedly, I should use 'made' in this sentence because it is in the past tense, but since the word is after 'could' and they are joined by using 'and', so do I still have to use the past form of 'make'?

I'm still not a teacher, but this I know for sure. You're right, "make" is OK.

Even a low sound could (catch my attention) and (make my hair rise).

A low sound could do two things: catch my attention and make my hair rise.

Even a low sound (could catch my attention) and (made my hair rise).

Two predicates are ascribed to "a low sound": "could catch my attention" (possibility) and "made my hair rise" (fact). It's difficult to imagine a context in which it would make sense.

[Tdol]

It's difficult to imagine a context in which it would make sense.

It's difficult, but I am sure that someone will manage it.