Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher


View Poll Results: A suitcase______is useless.
a. which has no handles 7 33.33%
b. that has no handles 14 66.67%
Voters: 21. This poll is closed

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-Oct-2003, 13:32
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,971
Member Type: Other
Default "which" as the head of a restrictive clause

I recently came across a definition for "which" that said (and I paraphrase) which can be used to introduce a restrictive clause. The example provided, see below, was cited from Oxford English:

Restrictive A suitcase which has no handles is useless. (note, no commas)

Non-Restrictive A suitcase, which has no handles, is useless. (note, commas)

The argument for "which" sans commas (Restrictive use) is this: if we take away the 'which has no handles' bit, the resulting bit is nonsense:

A suitcase is useless.

My question is this, if which is used to head a restrictive clause, then what's the difference between A and B below?

A. A suitcase which has no handles is useless.
B. A suitcase that has no handles is useless.

Uhm, is stress the key? The same person who provided the definition/examples also added that which is stressed and that that is unstressed, so speakers tend to use 'which' restrictively as a means of adding stress.

Huh?

Non-Oxford English speaka.
  #2  
Old 07-Oct-2003, 17:18
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,375
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

In BE, which can be used in a restrictive or a non-restrictive clause, but that can only be used in a restrictive clause. To me, there's no difference between your examples a&b. The stress would be dependent on context and intended meaning, not automatic. To distinguish between which + restrive\non-restrictive clause in speech would be done by a short pause or lower stress to show it's non-essential with a non-restrictive clause.

I understand the position in AE is different and, I presume, Canadian english follows the AE pattern.
  #3  
Old 07-Oct-2003, 20:14
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,539
Home Country: United States
Native Language: American English
Current Location: United States
Member Type: Other
Default

I agree with Tdol that both example sentences mean the same thing. Thus, I choose either. :wink:

By the way, in the second example sentence from Oxford, the which clause acts as an appositive phrase.

Quote:
A suitcase, which has no handles, is useless.
The phrase defines suitcase (incorrectly, I might add). That sentence is similar in nature to:
  • A chicken, which has short wings, cannot fly.

Interesting, huh?

:)
  #4  
Old 08-Oct-2003, 22:15
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,375
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

You're right, Ron; "A suitcase, which has no handles, is useless" is a weird sentence.
  #5  
Old 13-Oct-2003, 16:43
jwschang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
In BE, which can be used in a restrictive or a non-restrictive clause, but that can only be used in a restrictive clause. To me, there's no difference between your examples a&b. The stress would be dependent on context and intended meaning, not automatic. To distinguish between which + restrive\non-restrictive clause in speech would be done by a short pause or lower stress to show it's non-essential with a non-restrictive clause.

I understand the position in AE is different and, I presume, Canadian english follows the AE pattern.
AE, as I know it, almost always uses THAT as a relative pronoun (restrictive or otherwise). BE tends to make a distinction between the two: THAT is commonly used in a restrictive sense; WHICH is used in an informative sense. E.g.,
(1) A suitcase that has no handles....
(2) The hill, which rises above the surrounding country.....
  #6  
Old 13-Oct-2003, 18:00
jwschang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
You're right, Ron; "A suitcase, which has no handles, is useless" is a weird sentence.
If I may add further:
1. THAT is usually used with the indefinite article A/An, in order to restrict or define what was originally indefinite.
2. WHICH tends to be used with the definite article The, to add more information to something already identified.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
quotwhichquot, head, restrictive, clause


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We can reduce adverb clauses to adverb phrases. Why? Steven D General Language Discussions 48 23-Sep-2004 14:42
Conditional Clause Jesse Huang Ask a Teacher 3 30-Jul-2004 07:11
where is the subjective clause? jiang Ask a Teacher 3 17-Apr-2004 07:11
Relative clause Anonymous Ask a Teacher 3 11-Apr-2004 15:35


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.