I just want to know if any of these sentences in my essay do not make sense:

"The professor on the lecture refuses the reading passage in the sense that he says to the students that the psychologists are more tolerant about this risk-taking personality and he does not agree with the term universal. There are some points that support this thesis.

First of all it is written in the reading passage that the risk-taking personality behaviour is illogical, moreover states that the people with this type of personality have a death wish called Thanatos, in contrast the professor states that this people with this type of personality are safe because of their confidence in themselves the professor says that they thinks that nothing bad will happen to them and they will succeed.

Second point of contrast, the passage says that the people with this risk-taking personality are engage to dangerous activities for no reason or reward; in contrast that lecturer says that there are rewards such as physical or chemical reward that make dangerous activities pleasurable for instance the adrenaline and psychological in the sense that these dangerous experiences make people have more confidence.

And the last point, in the reading passage it is written that bad development on school could make young people do these dangerous activities but there are plenty adults that also do these activities. However the professor says that there are risks in adults that are foolish to take for instance smoking but sometimes it is necessary to do dangerous activities because of the rewards."