Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree3Likes
  • 3 Post By bhaisahab

Thread: at - to

  1. #1
    dilodi83 is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    589

    Default at - to

    - what time did Nygel finally turn up at/to the party, then?

    the book where I've taken this sentence from says that only at is correct, but I cannot understand why to is incorrect.
    If "turn up" in this sentence means "to go to", and it indicates a movement, why to write at, which does not indicate any sort of movement?
    Or does "to turn up" follow the rule like "to arrive at" and it needs to be followed by at?
    Could you explain this, please?

  2. #2
    bhaisahab's Avatar
    bhaisahab is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,156
    Teacher

    Default Re: at - to

    Quote Originally Posted by dilodi83 View Post
    - what time did Nygel finally turn up at/to the party, then?

    the book where I've taken this sentence from says that only at is correct, but I cannot understand why to is incorrect.
    If "turn up" in this sentence means "to go to", and it indicates a movement, why to write at, which does not indicate any sort of movement?
    Or does "to turn up" follow the rule like "to arrive at" and it needs to be followed by at?
    Could you explain this, please?
    To "turn up" somewhere is to arrive there, not go there. We arrive at places, not to.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0