Dear teachers?
California allows college aid to illegal immigrants.
if, instead of 'to', I said 'for', would it be correct?
Thanks
[QUOTE=Offroad;809346]
California allows college aid to illegal immigrants.
if, instead of 'to', I said 'for', would it be correct?
NOT A TEACHER
(1) As the teacher told you and me, native speakers would use either preposition in that headline.
(2) I did some googling, and it seems that the headlines of many news websites used "to" while some websites used "for."
(3) I found something very interesting in Professor Quirk's big grammar book.
(a) He says that we often use for when we are referring to an intended
recipient. (E.g., Mona is making a cake for her boyfriend. She wants her boyfriend to
get the cake, not the neighbors next door.)
(b) He says we often use to when we are referring to the actual recipient. (E.g.,
Mona made a cake and she sent it to her boyfriend. We can guess that he probably
got the cake.)
(4) Well, if (a big IF) this "rule" applies to that headline, then maybe (a big MAYBE),
the really "correct" headline should be:
CALIFORNIA ALLOWS COLLEGE AID FOR UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS
(a) "undocumented" is a gentler and kinder word than "illegal," which hurts people's feelings.
(b) If Dr. Quirk's "rule" applies here (and I don't know if it does), then maybe my headline
refers to the intended recipients (that is, those who are eligible to apply for college
aid if they wish to apply. Some will apply and some won't apply. But they are eligible if they are interested).
(c) If the headline had used "to," then it might have referred to people who were
already actually going to receive monetary assistance. (Remember the difference
between "make a cake for" and "sent a cake to"?) In other words, "to" would imply
money was on its way to the homes of some undocumented students.
Maybe it's a difference in variants, but I am closer to Prof. Quirk's position than a big if.![]()