Sentence 1:
In most of these experiments we encounter situations which fall in the above described regime, that is the size of the liquid reservoir is finite compared to the channel/tube dimensions.
Sentence 2:
In most of these experiments we encounter situations that fall in the above described regime, that is the size of the liquid reservoir is finite compared to the channel/tube dimensions.
Which is right?
Thanks!
I don't think there's a huge difference in meaning between the two sentences.
In a defining relative clause such as those in your two examples, 'that' and 'which' are both acceptable. There is no difference in meaning.
Last edited by 5jj; 14-Nov-2011 at 07:24. Reason: blunder
Non-defining?
In post #3 I originally wrote 'a non-defining clause'. Sorry. That was a careless slip that I have now corrected,![]()
Dear Srikanth Dhondi,
There is no difference in meaning between which and that. However, I would like to draw attention to the misuse of "compared to" and "compared with ".
Compare:
A is compared with B when you draw attention to difference.
...that is, the size of the liquid reservoir is finite compared with the channel/tube dimensions.
A is compared to B only when you want to stress similarity.
Shall I compare the to a summer’s day?
Your heart can be compared to a pump.
The Economist Style Guide (10th edition)
John
Last edited by JohnParis; 14-Nov-2011 at 08:14. Reason: spacing
Burchfield's 1996 edition of Fowler's Modern English Usage gives even more distinctions than the Economist Style Guide. I think it's probably true to say that most speakers of BrE use to and with interchangeably.