Ex:
1. The reason why it was created is to remove any risks of overheating.
2. The reason why it was created was to remove any risks of overheating.
Is the second setence the correct one?
Thanks in advance.
If you don't mind my suggestion:
It was created to remove any risk of overheating.
There is no reason at all to say "The reason it was created" when you have this type of "to" construction, and you NEVER needs to say "The reason why [something happened].
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
Even worse is: "The reason why ... is because ..."
Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.
The reason I am calling you is ...
not
The reason why I am calling you is ...
The reason he wrote the book was ...
not
The reason why he wrote the book was ...
And as Barb D said, you don't use "because" in these constructions either.
The reason I am calling you is that I need a favour.
not
The reason I am calling you is because I need a favour.
To echo 5jj's sentiments, the absolute worst possible sentence here would be:
The reason why I am calling you is because I need a favour!
Last edited by emsr2d2; 08-Jan-2012 at 14:04. Reason: Oops - quoted the wrong person, sorry 5jj!
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.