3Likes -
3 Post By 5jj
-
would not have vs would not have had
1. If he had seen a dentist regularly when he was a child, he would not have so many decayed teeth.
2. If he had seen a dentist regularly when he was a child, he would not have had so many decayed teeth.
Are both sentences fine and, if so, is there a difference in meaning between them?
Thanks.
-
Re: would not have vs would not have had
1. If he had seen a dentist regularly when he was a child, he would not have so many decayed teeth .
2. If he had seen a dentist regularly when he was a child, he would not have had so many decayed teeth.
They are both correct, and there may be little difference in meaning in practice. The first says that he has decayed teeth now, the second that he had decayed teeth in the past; he may still have them.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1