It could be correct. Knowing the entire sentence in context would help.
Hi,
Is he following passage correct? Otherwise, can you correct it, pease?
"...the semi-arid vegetation is contrasting with the green metropolitan vegetation."
It could be correct. Knowing the entire sentence in context would help.
Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.
Is there any particular reason to use the progressive form rather than the simple (contrasts)?
No. But here is the full paragraph:
We the take BR 406 highway and we move away from the coast, heading northwestward across the countryside, a region named the “Sertão” which means the “northeastern desert”, where the semi-arid vegetation is contrasting with the green metropolitan vegetation.
Unless you can see the green metropolitan vegetation at the same time, then don't use the present progressive.
"Where the semi-arid vegetation forms a sharp contrast to the green metropolitan vegetation behind us," or something like that.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
Thank you. Would "contrast with" instead of "contrast to" be wrong? And what about "heading northwestward across the countryside", is that correct?
"Metropolitan vegetation" is a phrase I never thought I would read.
And how do you name the trees, the grass, the bushes in the neighborhood a city? the vegetation of the metropolitan area?