Is it really inadmissible to write "don't" instead of "do not" or "can't" instead of "cannot", etc., in formal letters or, in general, in formal writing? I was tought so, but I am not sure of this: I saw such "don't"'s etc. in such a journal as The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science (the author was BE native speaker and the philosopher).
Best
Nyggus
Contractions are generally thought to have little or no place in formal writing. If he or she is a senior philospher, they can get away with it, but if you wrote an application letter with contractions, people might well think that you were a sloppy writer.![]()
Last edited by Tdol; 10-Jan-2006 at 05:08.
I don't want them to think like that, certainly. ThanksOriginally Posted by tdol
Look at this quotation: "However, it should be always remembered – and isn’t always – that …" It is from „Understanding English”, Paul Roberts, San Jose State College; Harper & Row, Publishers, New York and Evanston, 1958. The author is an expert in English language and uses contractions in formal writing. I am confused again...Originally Posted by tdol
![]()
Nyggus
You'd better stick to the rule which says that in formal writing it's much better to use full forms. Omit contractions. As simple as that :P
However, there's a tendency to simplify the language in all areas... sometimes this tendency leads to "oversimiplification".
As Tdol said... someone may think that you're a sloppy writer... however, personally, I don't care too much when I'm reading an article and there's "don't" instead of "do not". I guess I take certain things for granted.