Quote:
Faint, Sir, I made mistakes in every sentence but the first one?
It was only little things. :wink:
Um, what does the 5555 mean? :?
Quote:
I've tried my best to finish this. Pls check it.
I found that graph writing is very hard to be described precisely, especially some Noun.
Try:
- I have found that graphs are very hard to describe precisely.
(I don't get the part about the nouns.)
===========================================
Quote:
This table shows the comparison of metro system in six cities among three aspects: Building Year, Length of Route and Carrying Capacity per year (in millions).
- This table shows the comparison of the metro systems of six cities in three areas: the year construction was completed, length of route, and carrying capacity per year (in millions).
Actually, it is not really clear whether Year means the year construction was completed or the year service started. (That could, of course, be the same year.) You did that last part better than they have it in the graph. :D
Quote:
London has the earliest and the longest metro system which built in 1863 and reached 1100km.
You need to make that two sentences. Perhaps:
- London has the oldest and most extensive metro system. It was built in 1863 and has an overall length of 1100km.
What do you think? :D
Quote:
however, there are only 548 people using this system per year, almost one out of three than 1434 people of Tokyo, built in 1904 with a length of 149 km2.
That's a little confusing. Do you mean 548 million? In that case, I wouldn't say only there. Perhaps:
- About 548 million people use the London metro system each year. That's about a third as many as use the Tokyo metro system every year (1434 million people). The Tokyo system was built in 1904 and has an overall length of 149km.
Quote:
On the other hand, metro in Paris with 594 km2 length, built in 1890, carries 850 people every year. This is followed by Washington D.C., where station was built in 1921, 114km2 lengths, with 70 people using it per year.
- The system in Paris, 594km in overall length and built in 1890. carries 850 million people every year. The Washington, D.C. system, built in 1921 and with an overall length of 114km, is used by 70 million people a year.
Quote:
Metro system in Kyoto and Los Angeles were built very late: in 1989 and 2001 respectively. Kyoto has the shortest lengths of route (11km2) among 6 cities, and also has the lowest capacity (11 people). Similarly, Los Angeles has a mere 14 km2 route, but its capacity is very significant, reaching 306 people per year.
The systems in Kyoto and Los Angeles were built relatively recently: in 1989 and 2001 respectively. Kyoto's system has the shortest overall length of the six cities (11km), and it also has the lowest yearly capacity (11 million people).
You could also say annual instead of yearly.
:)